The money and capital markets are constantly adapting to meet
new requirements and conditions. This has given rise to new types
of securities that were not previously available.
Securitization refers to the transformation of illiquid,
risky individual loans into more liquid, less risky securities
referred to as asset-backed securities (ABS). The best
example of this process, the mortgage-backed securities
issued by the federal agencies mentioned above, such as Ginnie
Mae, are securities representing an investment in an underlying
pool of mortgages.
The federal agencies discussed earlier purchase mortgages from
banks and thrift institutions, repackage them in the form of
securities, and sell them to investors as mortgage pools.
Investors in mortgage-backed securities are, in face, purchasing a
piece of a mortgage pool, taking into consideration such factors
as maturity and the spread between the yield on the mortgage
security and the yield on 10-year Treasuries (considered a
benchmark in this market). Investors in mortgage-backed securities
assume little default risk because most mortgages are guaranteed
by one of the government agencies. However, these securities
present investors with uncertainty because they can receive
varying amounts of monthly payments depending on how quickly
homeowners pay off their mortgages. Although the stated maturity
can be as long as 40 years, the average life of these securities
to date has been much shorter.
Ginnie Mae issues are well known to investors. This wholly
owned government agency issues fully backed securities (i.e., they
are full faith and credit obligations of the U.S. government) in
support of the mortgage market. The GNMA pass-through
securities have attracted considerable attention in recent
years because the principal and interest payments on the
underlying mortgages used to collateralize them are "passed
through" to the bondholder monthly as the mortgages are repaid.
As a result of the trend to securitization, other asset-backed
securities have proliferated as financial institutions have rushed
to securitize various types of loans.
Marketable securities have been backed by car loans,
credit-card receivables, railcar leases, small-business loans,
photocopier leases, aircraft leases, and so forth. The assets that
can be securitized seem to be limited only by the imagination of
the packagers, as evidenced by the fact that by 1996 new asset
types include royalty streams from films, student loans, mutual
fund fees, tax liens, monthly electric utility bills, and
delinquent child support payments.
Who do investors like these asset-backed securities? The
attractions are relatively high yields and relatively short
maturities (often, five years) combined with investment-grade
credit ratings, typically the highest two ratings available.
Investors are often protected by a bond insurer. Institutional
investors such as pension funds and life insurance companies have
become increasingly attracted to ABS because of the higher yields,
and foreign investors are now buying these securities more often.
As for risks, securitization works best when
packaged loans are homogeneous, so that income streams and risks
are more predictable. This is clearly the case for home
mortgages, for example, which must adhere to strict guidelines. This
is not the case for some of the newer loans
being considered for packaging, such as loans for boats and motorcycles;
the smaller amount of information results in a larger risk
from unanticipated factors.