The world of investing, like most financial industries, has
scores of well established bench marks. These marks are
commonly tied to various market indexes. Typically, people can judge the
performance of their holdings based on the growth in relation to
a given index. This provides investors an
effective tool to help manage their portfolios. However, there is a
sharp disagreement on the best way this tool should be
used.
There are two major schools of thought in relation to the use of
benchmarks. The first group believes that investments should be
managed in such a way as to surpass a given index level. This is
accomplished through a technique called active investing. An
individual (or fund manager) who uses this method will keep a close
eye on the stocks within his holdings. Stocks will be bought and
sold within the portfolio based on price movements and other market
factors. It is not uncommon for active investors to adjust their
holdings on a very regular basis. The second group believes that
investments should not be aimed at beating an index, but rather they
should be created to match the benchmark. This technique calls for
people to create holdings that mirror a particular index. For
example, an individual might choose to duplicate the earnings of the
S&P 500. (one of the bigger index funds on the market) His goal
would be to match the earnings of the fund by purchasing the same
stocks as the S&P, in the same percentages.
The advantage of active investing is the potential for high
growth. It is important to note that they key word is "potential".
There is no guarantee that this will happen, and in most cases it
does not. The fact is that most funds which are actively traded do
not perform as well as their passively traded (also known as index
funds) counterparts. Additionally, there are a couple of other
disadvantages associated with active investing. First, taxes become
an issue due to the fact that stocks are frequently bought and sold.
Each time a stock is sold for a profit, the money is accessed a
short term capital gains tax. Secondly, if an individual hires a
professional fund manager, they will generally have to pay higher
fees than they would if they chose an index fund.
Active
investing can be a good option if the individual
managing the holdings has a proven track record. In these instances
it may be possible to receive the benefit of some
very nice returns. However, historical data shows us that passive investing typically offers
better returns for lower fees.